Análisis de los parámetros ecográficos descritos en el estudio del síndrome del túnel del carpo. Una revisión sistemática / Analysis of the echographic parameters described in the study of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review

El síndrome del túnel del carpo (STC) es la mononeuropatía por atrapamiento más frecuente; el diagnóstico se establece mediante pruebas electrodiagnósticas con un número sustancial de falsos positivos/negativos. Presentamos la siguiente revisión sistemática, cuyo objetivo es analizar la literatura más reciente en relación con los parámetros ecográficos descritos para estudiar el STC. Seleccionamos estudios que evaluasen parámetros ecográficos en pacientes con sospecha clínica, siguiendo las recomendaciones del manual Cochrane; incluimos revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, estudios caso-control y de pruebas diagnósticas, valorando estudios retrospectivos y revisiones bibliográficas con buena calidad metodológica. La revisión se hizo de artículos publicados entre 2005-2019. Incluimos 8 artículos (2 revisiones sistemáticas/metaanálisis, 2 estudios caso-control, un estudio de pruebas diagnósticas, 2 revisiones literarias y un estudio retrospectivo). Los parámetros analizados fueron el área de sección transversa del nervio mediano, el índice muñeca-antebrazo, el índice entrada-salida, el rango de adelgazamiento del nervio mediano, el abombamiento del retináculo flexor y la vascularización/movilidad. La evidencia actual permite afirmar que la ecografía tiene utilidad en el cribado del STC.(AU)

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy; the diagnosis is established by electrodiagnostic tests with until 34% of false positives/negatives. We present the following systematic review which objective is to analyze the most recent literature related to the ultrasound parameters described to study CTS. We selected studies that evaluated ultrasound parameters in patients with clinical suspicion following the Cochrane manual's recommendations. We include systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case–control studies and diagnostic tests, evaluating retrospective studies and bibliographic reviews with proper methodological quality. Articles published between 2005 and 2019. We included eight articles (two systematic reviews/meta-analyses, two case–control studies, one diagnostic test study, two literature reviews, and one retrospective). The parameters analyzed were cross-sectional area, wrist–forearm index, entry–exit index, thinning range, palmar bowing of the flexor retinaculum, and vascularity/mobility. Current evidence allows us to affirm that ultrasound is useful in screening for CTS.(AU)

[Analysis of the echographic parameters described in the study of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review]. / Análisis de los parámetros ecográficos descritos en el estudio del síndrome del túnel del carpo. Una revisión sistemática.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy; the diagnosis is established by electrodiagnostic tests with until 34% of false positives/negatives. We present the following systematic review which objective is to analyze the most recent literature related to the ultrasound parameters described to study CTS. We selected studies that evaluated ultrasound parameters in patients with clinical suspicion following the Cochrane manual's recommendations. We include systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case-control studies and diagnostic tests, evaluating retrospective studies and bibliographic reviews with proper methodological quality. Articles published between 2005 and 2019. We included eight articles (two systematic reviews/meta-analyses, two case-control studies, one diagnostic test study, two literature reviews, and one retrospective). The parameters analyzed were cross-sectional area, wrist-forearm index, entry-exit index, thinning range, palmar bowing of the flexor retinaculum, and vascularity/mobility. Current evidence allows us to affirm that ultrasound is useful in screening for CTS.

[Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation in urge urinary incontinence and faecal incontinence]. / Electroestimulación del nervio tibial posterior en incontinencia urinaria de urgencia e incontinencia fecal.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation (P-PTNS) in urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and faecal incontinence (FI) refractory to first-line treatment. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of treatment response. To do this, we performed a 2-year analytical, longitudinal and prospective study in patients with UUI and FI treated with P-PTNS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with UUI and FI who were treated with P-PTNS and who completed the bladder/faecal incontinence diary and severity and quality of life questionnaires. We excluded patients with neurogenic UUI and those who abandoned treatment or did not complete the questionnaires. We assessed demographic and clinical variables (micturition/defecation habits pre- and postreatment), severity scales before and after treatment (ICIQ-SF, Sandvick and Wexner), subjective improvement and quality of life (IQOL and FIQL pre- and postreatment). The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS v19. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 21 patients divided into 2 groups: -UUI group, 9 patients. After P-PTNS, there was a statistically significant improvement in diurnal (p=.018) and nocturnal (p=.016) urinary frequency, urgencies/day (p=.018), urine leakage/day (p=.027), ICIQ-SF and Sandvick (p=.018), and IQOL (p=.012). This improvement was related to exercise (p=.039) and prolapse (p=.05). -Group FI, 12 patients. After P-PTNS, there was a statistically significant improvement in defecation frequency (p=.027), incontinence (p=.012), Wexner scale (p=.007), and FIQL in its 4 dimensions (lifestyle, behaviour, embarrassment p=.005; and depression p=.008). This improvement was related to age (p=.048), time since onset (p=.044) and prolapse (p=.026). CONCLUSIONS: The P-PTNS is effective in UUI and FI refractory to conventional treatment. Treatment response is affected by several factors.